This perspective encourages a community perspective on the diversity of
Group and respect relativity but refuses even fundamental arguments
the willingness of countries to agree substantive coexistence laws, let alone
Laws of substance. This study reveals the expectations and rules are obsolete.
as reasons for behavior against material factors including economic factors
Benefit, land and national interest. National interest. For the sake of a popular realist,
In fact, foreign “protection” intervention will only be the interests and desire of the strong Edward Hallett Car Universal morality masquerading. This account is not recommended Helpful advocacy. It questions the potential of States to be altruistic and thus finds all state behavior as self-interested exercises of power
It threatens international order. Few nations, if any, publicly support the strategy.

The third view is the one that supports human rights most favorably. Liberalism and the wider cosmopolitan belief that human beings belong to an one global group are generally linked. It states that states have a constructive obligation to protect aliens from dictatorship and a right to do so because human rights are fundamental rights and should always be protected. According to conventional theorists, states settled on some minimum behavioural requirements. Action to promote human security across borders does not however, enforce the will of any dominant states but rather uphold and implement the universal principles and/or the common will of international community.

This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication license.