Marxism gives us an initial perspective that lets us rethink
Migration and reveals that, sociologically and economically, closing borders is a
In comparison to the system in which we all work, blind strategy. Capitalism, in reality, began a simultaneous mechanism of political borders and social transition by means of a the salary-labour. Historically and historically, Mainstream IR distinguishes those systems theoretically, by taking the domestic and foreign distinction as fixed and actual. Marxism believes that this contributes to obscuring the social ties and processes that connect people’s movements and the formation of boundaries. Dissociating the domestic and foreign stages, in other words, leads to feeling that becoming a migrant is the reserve of those persons rather than a situation to which we are all exposed. Crucially, it justifies considering refugees as second-class citizens and thereby contributes to more differences of race and culture.

More broadly, the function of theories and evidence is to discover what is true.
And what an illusion it is. The philosophy that drives Marxism seeks to apply this advice by grounding the interpretation of international affairs in the ways in which people have transformed, created, and increasingly rely on their capital to influence political structures such as state and international organizations. Historical materialism. In the history of the IR discipline, Marxism has made many inroads by being intrinsically concerned with the ways in which individuals and communities communicate and create things through boundaries, as well as how they coordinate themselves to control and oppose the creation and delivery of things across the world across institutions. More precisely, it suggests that the construction of modern boundaries is defined by the growth of capitalism, or tied in different ways to it.

This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication license.