Postcolonialism explores how economies, administrations and peoples
Foreign ties occur in previously colonized parts of the planet. To examine how core concepts like control, state and safety can be implemented
Postcolonialism provides a more nuanced view of the replication of the condition .Such ideas are representative of traditional ideologies. Postcolonialism further reveals how the West sees Islam and its adherents are an expression of Western insecurities themselves. The Spring Muslim-wide political Islam, characterized by Islamic Iran Revolution in 1979 – the influence of key cultural and social reforms that followed another exposed, not just challenged neo-imperialist interventions World economy intertwined. Many postcolonial scientists underline the continuation of oriental speeches Today’s recognizable representations in the West. Perceptions and representations Is essential to poscolonial theorists since they determine what is seen?As ordinary or significant.

In the South nuclear arms are generally considered untrusted. There are the following:
These states are designed as dangerous, impredictable or dominant discourses
Inexplainable and in violation of universal civil rights principles. You really need it.
Look how the two nuclear-pursuing nations of North Korea and Iran
In US foreign policy debate proliferation is described as rogue states.
Edward Said owes a considerable debt to Postcolonialism for its work
developing orientation. developing orientalism. However the writings of anticolonial and nationalist theorists like Frantz Fanon inspired Said himself

Building peace after war is a rising priority of IR scholars
In specific, as tensions grow larger and more dynamic. There’s even
Questions on how to restore post-conflict communities and how best to do so
Preventing relapses into conflict. Peacekeeping missions are one way to go.
The international community strives to create a permanent peace after war and
The conventional role of the United Nations in peacekeeping has considerably broadened. Missions Right Now it also requires a laundry list of state-building positions, including the re-establishment of police and armed forces and the establishment of political institutions. Feminist thinkers have showed how to preserve harmony,

Abuse toward women has also been illustrated by feminist IR academics
continues at or above rates in the post-conflict era
During the time of dispute. It encompasses harassment and sexual violence, Domestic abuse and trafficking and sex forced prostitution Financial uncertainty to reduce. The prevailing approach to preserving peace this form of aggression is mysterious. Issues such as ethnicity and home relations Abuse (and civil rights) as opposed to the ‘soft’ problems ‘hard’ or actual military protection problems. Therefore, this interpretation of reconciliation one that does not rely on women’s protection

Feminist Theory Challenges Women’s Almost Complete
Absence from standard IR philosophy and reality. If we begin with the first contribution to xenophobia – making women noticeable – an early one. The contribution of feminist thinkers shows that women have been and are It is regularly subject to gendered abuse. Make discrimination against women Visible, an international framework that tacitly approved a significant volume Abuse towards women as a natural state of affairs has also been revealed. It also shows a somewhat distinct picture abuse and instability seen across the defense policies of the Governments, Characteristic of conventional IR beliefs.

Feminism has illustrated the imbalance of women in making women visible.
From decision-making and hierarchical frameworks. For example, in 2015,
The World Bank reports that women make up just 22.9 per cent of the national population worldwide. Parliaments, sir. One of the fundamental assumptions of conventional viewpoints Feminism has been questioned by the exclusionary emphasis on fields that are Considered ‘high’ policy – for example, authority, the economy, and the military. Security. Security. The typical emphasis on states and ties between them overlooks the fact that men are primarily in charge of state institutions, The dominant authority and decision-making mechanisms. It ignores other fields as well , They both influence and are influenced by world politics.

Bhutan is a Buddhist kingdom in the Himalayas. Materials
Structural factors are expressed in a population of approximately 745,000,
A area of 38,394 square kilometers, a poor economy and a weak economy. Very small army. On top of that, Bhutan has a national boundary with the two major forces in Asia, China in the North and India in the South. The Bhutan place is geographically sensitive since the nation acts as a buffer state. Between these major powers, which see each other as competitors rather than rivals, Mates, guy. In addition, the Chinese leadership said after annexing, Tibet in the 1950s, the territory of Bhutan was also part of its mainland. To Date of the current border conflict between Bhutan and China And there have been rumors that the Chinese army has made a few of them Incursions in Bhutan. Likewise, India has had a hand in foreign Bhutan. Politics. Article 2 of the India-Bhutan Friendship Treaty (1949) states that ‘Bhutan accepts to be guided by India’s external guidance. Relationships.’ While this Essay was amended in 2007, the critics have commented. Stated that India still has a degree of control over Bhutan

The arrival of constructivism in IR is often correlated with the end of the Cold War,
An incident that struggled to achieve conventional philosophies such as realism and liberalism .Accounts with. Any of their main beliefs may be correlated with this failure, such as , The conviction that states are self-interested actors competing for power
And the unequal distribution of power among states that determines the balance of power Between them, strength. By having a dominant emphasis on the economy, conventional . Theories have not opened up much space for people to observe the organization. It was the acts of ordinary citizens, after all, which ensured the end of the
Cold War, not those of multinational bodies or nations. .The social universe is of our making accounts for this dilemma by arguing that In 1989). Actors (usually strong ones, such as politicians and powerful citizens) The very essence of global internationality is constantly influenced and often reshaped. In their acts and experiences, relationships

Constructivists contend that the Organization and the system are jointly constituted;
Which means that the systems influence the Agency and that the Agency influences
Structure. The Organization can be interpreted as someone’s willingness to act,
Whereas the framework applies to the international system made up of material
And the ideal elements. Returning to the example of Wendt discussed above, this
In other words, the social enmity relationship between the United States and the North Korea represents an inter-subjective structure i.e. mutual thoughts and ideas)
Doubts between the two nations, while the United States and North Korea are
Actors that have the ability to alter or improve the Agency
An existing enmity system or social relationship. This adjustment or reinforcement essentially depends on the values and ideas of both states. If these are
Beliefs and ideas are evolving, the social relationship will change to one of them.
Friendship, guy. This view varies considerably from that of the realists, who contend.
That the anarchic nature of the international system is defined by
Conduct of nations. Constructivists, on the other hand, claim that ‘anarchy’
What are the states making of it. This means there will be chaos
Interpreted in various ways, depending on the meaning given to the performers.
It is.

Book Review

The subject and the point of discussion for the book Twitter and Tear Gas are the protest movements that have taken a boost with the arrival of modern internet technology (Tufekci, 2017). Tufekci has observed and pointed out how modern protests have changed because of the arrival of the internet. The power of the internet is making possible the protest movements at large scale. Ethnographic research and deft analysis have been put in her book, having a significant data analysis from social media outlets. The book lessons are much wider than the central topic, which makes the book entertaining and insightful. Tufekci has explained the book concepts using two opposing models. First, the internet has made the protesters like a mammoth who have influence over society and government. It is evident from the successful revolutions from 2010 to 2013 of Egypt, Ukraine, and Tunisia. Second, today’s protests are not influencing the large population like protests of years back; the internet has made them ineffectual. In social movements, both social media and computer algorithms are implemented to orchestrate the agenda. In response, the government uses technology to manipulate social movements while using technological affordances. As a result of these implications, the forces help the society in mobilizing and demobilizing for a cause and agenda.

The book subtitle is ‘The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest.’ With the internet, protesters are getting this power as a tool to influence the public. The internet is giving newfound abilities to them to quickly organize and scale. The author says that judging the modern and pre-internet protests on the same scale would be a mistake. If hundreds of thousands of people were gathered to listen to the speech of Martin Luther King Jr., it was a culmination of a multi-year protest effort and six months of careful planning. With the arrival of the internet, many people came together in the 2011 Cairo protests because they were loosely coordinated on Twitter and Facebook.

Nepalese of the Sherpa region had put an effort to assist the climbers of Mount Everest by carrying supplies, such as ropes and ladders, for them That is the power through which people with less training made a great effort. The author of the book explains that the internet has made possible gradually and rapidly the start of networked movements where there has become less need to make prior formal and informal efforts for the inevitable challenges. All is possible just by changing the tactics. The phenomenon called “tactical freeze” given by Tofekci says: “Make movement, wide decisions and survive over the long haul” (Tufekci, 2017). The purpose of Tofekci’s book is not to argue that modern protests are less effective and unsuccessful, but her focus is that they are different. So, in order to lead an effective movement, the protesters need to understand the differences and extract advantages of their movements.

The taxonomy of the author of the book Twitter and Tear Gas is a more general discussion over the effect of the internet on society. In my perception, our technological future is a long characterization between quick and strong. The quick make the first use of new technology to expand their power. The people of this category are marginalized groups, hackers, and criminals. However, the strong are slower, and they expand their power slowly. In this case, protesters use Facebook first for the purpose of organization. Later on, the government uses Facebook on how to track protesters. There is no clear distinction on who will take the upper hand in the long run.

Globalization is the term adopted to illustrate the increasing reliance of the world’s markets, societies, and cultures, brought closer by inter-border trade in products and services, investment streams, technology, individuals, and data. Countries have developed economic assistance to promote these movements for hundreds of years (Jameson & Miyoshi, 1998). Over the centuries, the global village has realized that focusing on economic development is better than enforcing wars on one another, putting an end to empires.

Today, when I went to the supermarket, I put on my lens of globalization and witnessed many things that I ignored before. Starting with leaving my home, I took out my phone to take pictures, and then I realized that my phone is a Chinese product, the first impact of globalization on my day. As I walked down the street, I saw a couple of Muslim citizens wearing their traditional scarves and caps. This showed how individuals from different cultures across the border practice their culture and traditions in this country. As I crossed by them, I saw a billboard portraying a Google advertisement showing how android has connected millions of people worldwide. This technological transfer from an American company into the entire world shows how globalization is deeply rooted in our lives. Even before entering the supermarket, I had stumbled upon many things that came in the category of globalization, but after entering there, I witnessed even more. There were local and imported products in every rack, which came through the logistical processes to the store. Like Swiss chocolate or Turkish jewellery, the imported products arrived at the store by ship or air to the country first. And after arriving at airports or dry ports, the logistics companies supply these products everywhere. Although I could not take a picture of any truck unloading the products, I believe globalization must have an impact there as well. Globalization is everywhere if a person starts to look at it. From our clothes to smartphones and cars, everything is jointly made. Even American based companies cannot claim success without taking the help of foreign expertise in technology, labor, or any other services.

I chose Realism because its exactly what’s going on in America today .A realism walks into a bar and order a half glass of wine .Realism is basically power and security ,since we live into a world we can’t trust anyone. Realism   or political realism is a theory that emphasizes the competitive and contradictory aspects of international politics (Karpowicz & Julian, 2018). Phenomenally, realism theory proposes a few underlying facades that contend the states as the most imperative actors and refers international system as anarchic. Moreover, it is asserted that within a state, nothing is more superior to the state itself, and therefore, everyone has to work for establishing interaction; otherwise, the most potent one will take charge of overall control. The fundamental archetype of realism stresses the notion of survival for the international states that compels them to pursue self-interest and defense as rational, pragmatic, and unitary actors. Consequently, states establish and maintain their armies and other surviving techniques that create anarchy in the international system. The meme utters the very concept and says that the international system is anarchic in realism because it seems rational; it is sarcastic and realistic at the same time.